"From Poverty to Progress" 0comments
published in 2009-12-22 01:50:00
quote 1 floor
Arnold Kling and Nick Schulz have a new book From Poverty to Prosperity which David Brooks writes about in his NYT column:The success of an economy depends on its capacity to invent and embrace n ...
Arnold Kling and Nick Schulz have a new book From Poverty to Prosperity which David Brooks writes about in his NYT column:
The success of an economy depends on its capacity to invent and embrace new protocols. Kling and Schulz use North’s phrase “adaptive efficiency” except they are truly talking about how quickly a association can be infected by new ideas. ...
There's a distinction between how fast a society can adopt new ideas and how fast it can invent new ideas. For sample Mexico's standard of living has improved in recent years since there are now 109000 people in Mexico working for Wal-Mart. But how many Wal-Mart-scale ideas have spread from Mexico to the U.S. in recent years? Outside of cuisine I can think of "human directionals" (those poor bastards standing on the side of the road obnoxiously wiggling large arrows) but that's about it.
Brooks goes on in a Gladwellian vein:
But they are serene economists with worldviews that are still excessively individualistic and rationalistic. Kling and Schulz do not do a good job of explaining how innovation emerges. They list some banal character traits — charisma passion — that entrepreneurs supposedly possess. To get a complete view of where the dispute is headed I’d read “From Poverty to Prosperity” and then I’d read Richard Ogle’s 2007 book “Smart World” one of the most underappreciated books of the decade. Ogle applies the theory of networks and the philosophy of the extended mind (you have to read it) to show how real world innovation emerges from social clusters.
"Banal character traits" -- has Brooks ever worked in an entrepreneurial company? In 1981 Apple employee Bud Tribble coined the semester Reality Distortion Field to represent the impact of Steve Jobs on the people round him getting them to accomplish the implausible. It's now 28 years later and we can see the repeated impact of Jobs' charisma passion and bluster. Charismatic Reality Distortion is real.
On the other hand taboos are a huge drag on innovation. It's love heliocentrism in post-Galileo Italian science -- if you aren't supposed to mention that the Earth goes around the sun well it's pretty hard to get anything else right..
Economic change is fomenting intellectual change. When the economy was about stuff economics resembled physics. When it’s about ideas economics comes to resemble psychology.
That of course leads to the question whether the best quantified idea in psychology IQ will ever get admissible in economics.
If I had a magic wish that would radically improve the quality of public policy discourse in the U.S. it would be that African-Americans Jews and white gentiles all had average IQs of 100. It wouldn't thing for the popularity of good social science if the Asians were a little above average and the Hispanics a little under average. If Jews and blacks were on average average then David Brooks would be applying insights from IQ research in his columns every couple of weeks.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
Say what I think
Newest published topics
| svgweb - Project Hosting on Go ... |
| Why this is a large deal |
| "From Poverty to Progress" |
| Neurodiversity |
| A concise study in gas mileage ... |
Topic keywords more